| Thread Name: Re: Adams Jacket From: modlib at windstream.net (Ron Holl) Date: Tue Jan 13 12:08:31 2009 > POINT OF INTEREST.? I have a B jacket that dates to 1959 while Brian has a? C jacket that dates to 1957.? We already have evidence that jacket designs overlapped in their use! ------------------ Darrell, I suspect that the second Adams jacket displayed on ModernLib (the so called B jacket) is a misprint of some kind.... and not an intentional design change. We may find it restricted to just one season, or a very tight range of dates. ------------------------------------- From: kamins at modernlib.com (Scot Kamins) Date: Tue Jan 13 17:36:33 2009 Begin forwarded message: From Darrell Johnson <zebradlj@yahoo.com > Date January 13, 2009 2:40:45 PM PST To Scot Kamins <kamins@modernlib.com > Subject Re: Jacket Range Project: Adams; "Education," & Discussion of design. Reply-To: zebradlj@yahoo.com Scot, I called them A, B C, and D for brevity's sake. But the descriptions are there so when I have my laptop with me somewhere looking for books and I cannot get on the internet to look at the website photos that I will have some clue what the A, B, C and D mean without seeing pictures of them. The Letter designation will be in chronological order for any of these posts. If the descriptions confuse someone s/he can ignore them, glance at the photos on the site and say A, B, C, etc... in order, and thus correctly name them. Darrell ------------------------------------- From: kamins at modernlib.com (Scot Kamins) Date: Tue Jan 13 17:40:15 2009 OK - so I gather from this that the material you've been sending to the mailing list includes stuff for your own use applying to several projects, one of which is the DJ Date Range project -- yes? When you say "The Letter designation will be in chronological order for any of these posts" do you mean the chronological order of the dates above the DJ types as listed on ModernLib? If so, what happens if a new DJ is discovered with dates falling between two existing dates? Scot Kamins ------------------------------------- From: modlib at windstream.net (Ron Holl) Date: Tue Jan 13 18:12:34 2009 > I suspect that the second Adams jacket displayed on ModernLib (the so called B jacket) is a misprint of some kind.... and not an intentional design change. We may find it restricted to just one season, or a very tight range of dates. ------------------------------- Following up on this theory, I have confirmed that the Adams jacket WITH the intro text (the jacket with the 1963 date on modernlib.com, and what Darrell calls "C") is the standard jacket for that entire period (40's, 50's, 60's). That jacket exists with 268 titles, wrapped around a #7 binding book. This makes it a Fall 1939 jacket. I don't know if the #7 binding is the larger size, as found on 11.3 of that time. I'll try and find out. The jacket without the intro text is likely a printing error. ------------------------------------- From: modlib at windstream.net (Ron Holl) Date: Tue Jan 13 18:14:01 2009 > When you say "The Letter designation will be in chronological order > for any of these posts" do you mean the chronological order of the > dates above the DJ types as listed on ModernLib? If so, what happens > if a new DJ is discovered with dates falling between two existing dates? The Adams jacket already has this problem. The jacket called "C" immediately follows the jacket called "A". ------------------------------------- From: kamins at modernlib.com (Scot Kamins) Date: Tue Jan 13 18:35:27 2009 Begin forwarded message: From Darrell Johnson <zebradlj@yahoo.com > Date January 13, 2009 3:35:45 PM PST To Scot Kamins <kamins@modernlib.com > Subject Re: Jacket Range Project: Adams; "Education," & Discussion of design. Scot, A new jacket appearing occurred to me. That's why they have a letter designation AND the brief description. Its like new Toledano #'s for variants. We have a couple now that are not in chronological order even though they pertain to the same title. IF we have a new "in between" jacket the brief description will be crucial and it doesn't hurt that ithe description was there "from the beginning," rather than needing to be introduced when the problem arises. Because, after all, until the problem crops up, anyone who can look at the website can just ingore the description and say their A, B, C's. Darrell ------------------------------------- |